MGSC 3005 · Week 8 · Session 2

Estimating an Unknown Mean: Building and Understanding a Confidence Interval

You will act as the analyst. You do not know the population. You get one sample, and from it you build a confidence interval for the population mean. Then a simulation shows what "95% confident" really means. Work through the steps in order. Each step unlocks the next one.

Business context (Doane Example 8.3). The MBA admissions office at a medium-sized public university wants to know the average GMAT score of its whole applicant pool. Checking every applicant's file is costly, so an analyst draws a random sample of applicants and uses it to estimate the true mean score μ. The true value of μ stays hidden until Step 6.
1

What we know and what we don't

In real business work, the population is unknown. We cannot see every applicant's score, so we cannot compute μ directly. All we will have is one sample.

Population mean
μ = ?
parameter: what we want to estimate
Population std. dev.
σ = ?
parameter: usually unknown too
Population shape
?
we never see the whole pool

Parameters vs. statistics

SymbolMeaningTypeDo we know it?
μPopulation mean GMAT scoreParameter (fixed number)Unknown: the target
σPopulation standard deviationParameter (fixed number)Usually unknown
nSample size (number of applicants sampled)Design choiceYou choose it
xSample meanStatistic (changes from sample to sample)Computed from the sample
sSample standard deviationStatistic (changes from sample to sample)Computed from the sample

The plan: use the statistic x as our best single guess (the point estimate) for the parameter μ. Then add a margin of error so we report a range instead of one number.

2

Draw your one sample

Finish Step 1 to unlock.

Choose the sample size. Doane Example 8.3 uses n = 20, so start there.

3

The formula when σ is known

Finish Step 2 to unlock.

When the population standard deviation σ is known, we can build a confidence interval for the unknown mean μ using the normal distribution.

In this lab, σ is known. From many years of past applicant data, the admissions office knows that GMAT scores in its pool have a population standard deviation of σ = 86.80. The population mean μ is still unknown; that is what we estimate. (You computed s in Step 2, but because σ is known, the formula uses σ.)

Every confidence interval in Chapter 8 has the same skeleton:

point estimate ± critical value × standard error

Margin of error (ME) = critical value × standard error. The interval is point estimate ± ME.

Confidence interval for μ with known σ (slide 20, Eq. 8.6)

CI for μ, σ known x̄ ± zα/2 σ√n
x̄
Sample mean, calculated from a random sample x1, x2, …, xn. This is the point estimate (from your Step 2 sample).
σ
Population standard deviation, assumed known. Here σ = 86.80.
n
Sample size. Here n = 20.
σ/√n
Standard error of x̄: how much sample means typically vary from sample to sample.
1 − α
Confidence level: the middle area under the curve (for example, 0.95).
α
The leftover area, split into two symmetric tails, each with area α/2.
zα/2
Critical z-value: the cutoff that leaves area α/2 in each tail. Determined by the desired confidence level.

Choose a confidence level and watch the picture change:

Middle area = confidence level 1 − α Two tails, each α/2
Confidence level 1 − ααα/2 (each tail)zα/2Excel

A higher confidence level gives a larger zα/2 and a wider interval. Greater confidence costs precision.

Your interval, piece by piece

4

Build your 95% confidence interval in Excel

Finish Step 3 to unlock.

Use your sample mean from Step 2, the known σ = 86.80, and the six-step workflow from class. Keep your Excel sheet open next to this page.

StepQuantityExcel formula
1Inputs: x̄, σ, n, confidence level=AVERAGE(A1:A20), 86.80, 20, 0.95
2α and critical value zα/2α = =1−0.95, then =NORM.S.INV(1−α/2)
3Standard error σ / √n=86.80/SQRT(20)
4Margin of error=z × SE (shortcut: =CONFIDENCE.NORM(α, 86.80, 20))
5Lower and upper bounds=x̄ − ME and =x̄ + ME
6InterpretationStep 5 on this page
5

Interpret your interval

Finish Step 4 to unlock.

Use the reusable sentence frame from class. Here it is with your numbers filled in:

Which statement about your interval is correct?
6

Lift the curtain: did your interval catch μ?

Finish Step 5 to unlock.
This never happens in real life. An analyst never gets to see the true μ. We reveal it here only so you can check how the method performs.
7

What does "95% confident" mean? Repeat the whole process many times

Finish Step 6 to unlock.

Imagine 100 analysts. Each one draws their own random sample of the same size and builds a confidence interval with the same formula, x̄ ± zα/2 σ/√n, exactly as you did. Every interval will be a little different. How many of them will contain the true μ?

Predict first. Out of 100 intervals at the 95% level, about how many will contain μ?
Intervals built
0
Contain μ
0
Miss μ
0
Percent containing μ
–
target: 95%
Each horizontal line is one sample's confidence interval (newest at the top)
Contains μ Misses μ x̄ of that sample True μ (fixed)

Running percentage of intervals that contain μ

Check the count yourself in Excel

  1. Click Copy all intervals for Excel. Paste into a new sheet at cell A1. You get columns: Sample, x̄, Lower, Upper.
  2. In E1 type Contains μ? In E2 type =AND(C2<=520.78, D2>=520.78) and fill down.
  3. Count the hits: =COUNTIF(E:E, TRUE). Percentage: =COUNTIF(E:E,TRUE)/COUNT(A:A)
Try these experiments
  • Switch to 99% and draw 100 more. The intervals get wider and fewer of them miss.
  • Switch to 90%. The intervals get narrower, and about 1 in 10 misses.
  • Switch to n = 50. The intervals get narrower, but the hit rate stays near the confidence level. Larger samples buy precision, not a different success rate.
  • Look closely: at a given level and n, every interval has the same width, 2 × zα/2 × σ/√n. Only the center x̄ moves from sample to sample.
Build at least 100 intervals to continue.
8

What did you discover?

Build at least 100 intervals in Step 7 to unlock.

Answer each question on your own first, then check.

1. In the simulation, what moved from sample to sample: μ or the intervals?
The intervals. μ is a fixed number (the dashed line never moved). Each new sample gives a new x̄, so the interval slides around.
2. What does "95% confidence" describe?
The long-run reliability of the procedure. If we drew many samples this way and built one interval from each, about 95% of those intervals would contain μ. Your simulation showed this.
3. Is there a 95% probability that μ is inside your one interval from Step 4?
No. Once your sample is drawn, your interval is fixed and μ is fixed. The interval either contains μ or it does not (probability 1 or 0). We just do not know which, so we say we are "95% confident."
4. What happened when you raised the confidence level from 95% to 99%?
The critical value grew (for example, z from 1.960 to 2.576), so the intervals got wider and fewer missed μ. More confidence costs precision.
5. What happened when you increased n from 20 to 50?
The intervals got narrower, because the standard error σ/√n shrinks as n grows. The percentage that contain μ stayed near the confidence level. A bigger sample gives a more precise estimate at the same confidence.
6. In the simulation, why did all the intervals at the same level and n have the same width?
Because the margin of error is zα/2 × σ/√n, and zα/2, σ and n are the same for every analyst. Only x̄ changes from sample to sample, so each interval is the same-length ruler slid to a different center.
Confidence interval for μ (σ known). x̄ ± zα/2 · σ/√n. The sample gives the point estimate x̄; the margin of error reflects sampling uncertainty.

Sentence frame: "We are [level]% confident that the true mean GMAT score μ is between [lower] and [upper]. If we drew many samples this way and built one interval from each, about [level]% of those intervals would contain μ."

"The 95% describes the method, not any one interval."

μ never moves. The intervals do.